The Library

Car Accident Statute of Limitations in Palmdale

car-accident · By John K. Mazin, Attorney ·

Last updated

Car Accident in Palmdale, California

Rated 5.0 ★ from 262 Google reviews

California imposes strict deadlines on car accident claims in Palmdale. Missing the two-year personal injury deadline or the six-month government claim.

In Palmdale, California, the statute of limitations for a car accident personal injury claim is two years from the date of the collision under CCP §335.1. If a government entity is involved, you must file an administrative claim within six months under Government Code §911.2, or your lawsuit is barred regardless of the two-year window.

In Palmdale, California, the statute of limitations for a car accident personal injury claim is two years from the date of the collision under Code of Civil Procedure §335.1. If a government entity is involved, you must file an administrative claim within six months under Government Code §911.2, or your lawsuit is barred.

Key takeaways

  • Two-year deadline for personal injury claims under CCP §335.1; six months for government claims under Gov. Code §911.2.
  • Cases are filed at Michael D. Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, 42011 4th Street West, Lancaster, CA 93534.
  • Antelope Valley Medical Center, a Level II trauma center, treats severe crash injuries from State Route 14 collisions.
  • Property damage claims carry a three-year deadline under CCP §338, separate from the personal injury window.

Palmdale's high-speed corridors—State Route 14, State Route 138, Palmdale Boulevard and Sierra Highway—generate thousands of collisions each year. When crashes result in serious injuries, victims face not only medical bills and lost wages, but also a ticking clock. California's statute of limitations imposes hard deadlines that vary depending on who caused the crash and what type of harm you suffered.

Understanding these deadlines is not academic; missing one extinguishes your legal claim forever, no matter how catastrophic your injuries. Every car accident case filed in Los Angeles County begins with a single question: are you still within the statutory window? The answer depends on the collision date, the defendant's identity, and the nature of your damages.

The two-year personal injury deadline

California Code of Civil Procedure §335.1 establishes a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims arising from car accidents. The clock starts on the date of the collision—not the date you discover the full extent of your injuries, hire counsel, or finish medical treatment. If you were injured on Rancho Vista Boulevard on March 1, 2024, you must file a complaint by March 1, 2026, or lose the right to sue the at-fault driver.

This rule applies uniformly across Los Angeles County, including Palmdale. The two-year window governs claims for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and permanent disability. It does not extend simply because negotiations are ongoing or because an insurer has opened a file. Once the deadline passes, California courts lack jurisdiction to hear your case, and no exception revives it absent narrow tolling doctrines such as minority or incompetence.

The six-month government claim requirement

When a city bus, county road crew, Caltrans maintenance vehicle, or any government employee causes a crash, Government Code §911.2 imposes a six-month administrative claim deadline. You must file a written claim with the appropriate public entity within 180 days of the accident. Only after the entity denies that claim—or six months elapse without action—may you file a lawsuit, and even then the two-year litigation deadline under §335.1 still applies.

This requirement is unforgiving. A collision on State Route 14 involving a Caltrans truck, or on Palmdale Boulevard with a municipal vehicle, triggers the six-month clock immediately. Failure to submit the administrative claim by the deadline bars the lawsuit entirely, even if you are still within the two-year personal injury window. The claim must name the responsible agency, describe the accident, specify the injury and damages, and state a dollar amount.

Property damage and other deadlines

Vehicle damage claims carry a separate three-year statute of limitations under Code of Civil Procedure §338. Because property damage and personal injury arise from the same collision, plaintiffs often assert both in a single complaint. Yet the longer property damage window can create strategic choices: you may settle the injury claim within two years while preserving the property claim for later resolution, or consolidate everything if efficiency and finality outweigh flexibility.

Beyond civil deadlines, California Vehicle Code §20008 requires a written report to police or the California Highway Patrol within 24 hours of any injury crash, and §16000 mandates filing an SR-1 report with the DMV within ten days if the collision caused injury, death, or property damage exceeding $1,000. These reporting obligations do not extend your litigation deadline, but failing to comply can complicate your claim and trigger license suspension under §16056.

Local details

All car accident lawsuits filed by Palmdale residents are heard in the Los Angeles Superior Court, North District, at the Michael D. Antonovich Antelope Valley Courthouse, 42011 4th Street West, Lancaster, CA 93534. The courthouse serves the entire Antelope Valley, and your complaint must be filed there before the applicable statute of limitations expires. Electronic filing is available, but the timestamp on the filing—not the postmark—determines whether you met the deadline.

Collisions on State Route 14, the Antelope Valley Freeway, and State Route 138 frequently result in high-speed, multi-vehicle crashes. Victims are often transported to Antelope Valley Medical Center, a Level II trauma center at 1600 West Avenue J in Lancaster. Severe injuries treated there—traumatic brain injury, spinal fractures, internal bleeding—typically generate the largest claims, and preserving evidence and witness statements early is critical when the two-year clock is already running.

Frequently asked questions

Does the statute of limitations pause if I am negotiating with an insurance company?

No. Settlement discussions, demand letters, and the insurer's investigation do not toll or extend the two-year deadline under CCP §335.1. Insurers are aware of the statute of limitations and may delay offers strategically. You remain responsible for filing suit before the deadline expires, even if the adjuster promises a resolution is imminent.

What happens if I was partially at fault for the crash?

California follows pure comparative negligence, meaning you may recover damages even if you were mostly at fault. Your award is reduced by your percentage of fault—50 percent fault yields 50 percent recovery. Comparative negligence does not alter the statute of limitations; the two-year and six-month deadlines apply regardless of how blame is apportioned between the parties.

Can I reopen a claim after the statute of limitations has expired?

Generally, no. Once the statutory deadline passes, the claim is permanently barred. Narrow exceptions exist for plaintiffs who were minors or legally incompetent when the collision occurred, but these tolling doctrines are fact-intensive and require court approval. Relying on an exception is risky; the safest course is filing before the original deadline expires.

Does the deadline change if the at-fault driver left the scene or I did not know their identity?

The two-year statute of limitations runs from the date of the collision, not the date you identify the defendant. If the driver fled the scene on Sierra Highway, you still must file within two years. You may name Doe defendants and amend the complaint once you learn their identity through DMV records, traffic camera footage, or witness statements obtained during discovery.

Related reading

Sources

Talk to a Palmdale car accident attorney

Our California personal injury attorneys offer a free, confidential case review. Call (800) 800-8910 any time, day or night, or request a free case review.

About the author

John K. Mazin — Attorney, California Personal Injury Attorneys

John is a dedicated advocate for injured individuals, bringing precision, empathy, and unwavering attention to detail to every case he handles. A second-generation personal injury attorney, John attended the University of Alabama and earned his Juris Doctor from SMU Dedman School of Law, where he graduated cum laude. First admitted to the State Bar of Texas in 2019, John began his career working in commercial real estate and public policy, where he represented property owners in over $150 million of acquisitions, dispositions, and financing, and helped drive reforms to benefit all people across the country. This experience navigating high-stakes matters, complex transactions, and hostile hearings gives him a powerful advantage when standing up to insurance companies and defending the rights of injured persons. John has built a reputation as a meticulous and tenacious representative—someone who digs deeply into the details of an accident, works tirelessly to uncover the truth, and fights for the full compensation his clients deserve. His multistate admissions allow him to assist a wide range of clients with diverse and evolving legal needs. Above all, John understands the overwhelming impact a car accident can have on a person's life. Whether the injuries seem minor or catastrophic, he approaches every case with compassion, clarity, and an unwavering commitment to his clients' recovery. He is driven by the belief that every accident victim deserves an advocate who will listen, understand, and stand up for them every step of the way. Professional Memberships and Affiliations: Member, Ventura County Bar Association; Member, San Fernando Valley Bar Association; Member, Los Angeles County Bar Association; Member, Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles; Consumer Attorneys of California; Member, Dallas Bar Association.

Read John K. Mazin's full profile