The Library
What Happens If the Insurance Company Says We Were Each 50/50 at Fault in a Norwalk, CA Car Accident?
car-accident · By Payam Soliemanzadeh, Founder and President ·
Written and reviewed by Payam Soliemanzadeh, Founder and President — Updated
Rated 5.0 ★ from 260 Google reviews
California's pure comparative negligence rule allows you to recover damages even when an insurer assigns 50/50 fault, though your compensation is reduced by your percentage of responsibility. Any Norwalk car accident case involving disputed liability must be filed within two years under CCP §335.1, or six months if a government entity is involved under Gov. Code §911.2.
Under California's pure comparative negligence system, a 50/50 fault determination means each driver can recover damages from the other, but each recovery is reduced by 50 percent. You are not barred from compensation simply because you share equal blame. The insurer's initial allocation is not final; you may challenge it through negotiation or litigation in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Under California's pure comparative negligence law, a 50/50 fault determination means you can still recover damages, but your compensation is reduced by fifty percent. The insurance company's allocation is not binding; you may challenge it through negotiation or by filing a lawsuit at Norwalk Courthouse within two years under CCP §335.1, or six months under Gov. Code §911.2 if a government entity is involved.
Key takeaways
- California's pure comparative negligence rule lets you recover even at 50/50 fault, reduced by your percentage.
- File at Norwalk Courthouse, 12720 Norwalk Boulevard, within two years or six months for government claims.
- Crashes on Interstate 5, Interstate 605 or State Route 91 often involve disputed liability allocations.
- St. Francis Medical Center records and police reports help prove fault in Los Angeles County cases.
Collisions at congested intersections along Interstate 5, Interstate 605, and State Route 91 in Norwalk frequently generate competing fault narratives. Insurers often assign equal blame to minimize payouts, especially when neither driver clearly violated Vehicle Code §16025 or §20008 reporting duties. A 50/50 determination feels unjust if you believe the other party caused the crash, but California law still permits partial recovery.
Pure comparative negligence applies in every Norwalk car accident case heard at the Southeast District courthouse. Unlike contributory-negligence states that bar any recovery if you share blame, California reduces your award proportionally. Understanding how insurers calculate fault—and how to contest their conclusions—determines whether you accept a halved settlement or pursue full compensation through litigation.
How California's pure comparative negligence works in shared-fault accidents
Civil Code §1714 establishes California's pure comparative negligence system, which permits recovery even when you are 99 percent at fault. Your damages are simply reduced by your percentage of responsibility. If your medical bills, lost wages, and pain-and-suffering total $100,000 and you are deemed 50 percent liable, you recover $50,000. The other driver, if equally injured, recovers half of their own damages from you or your insurer.
This framework applies to every car accident claim in Los Angeles County, whether settled or tried. Juries receive instructions on comparative fault, and the court reduces the verdict accordingly. Because neither party is entirely barred, disputes over whether fault is 50/50, 60/40, or 70/30 become the central battleground, often hinging on witness statements, traffic-camera footage from corridors like Firestone Boulevard or Rosecrans Avenue, and accident-reconstruction analysis.
Why insurers assign 50/50 fault and how to challenge the determination
Adjusters deploy 50/50 allocations when evidence is ambiguous, when both drivers share some Vehicle Code violation, or when neither party secured independent witnesses. A rear-end collision on Pioneer Boulevard may be labeled shared fault if the lead driver braked suddenly without cause and the trailing driver followed too closely. The insurer minimizes its payout by splitting blame, knowing many claimants will accept a halved settlement rather than litigate.
You challenge a 50/50 finding by gathering evidence the adjuster ignored: dashcam video, statements from passengers transported to St. Francis Medical Center, the CHP report filed under Vehicle Code §20008, time-stamped photos of skid marks, and traffic-signal timing records from the city. Retained counsel can commission an independent reconstruction, depose the other driver, and file a complaint at Norwalk Courthouse to force the insurer to justify its allocation before a jury that may assign far less fault to you.
Impact on your recovery and the role of uninsured-motorist coverage
At 50/50 fault, you collect half your damages from the other driver's liability policy, subject to Vehicle Code §16056 financial-responsibility limits—now $30,000 per person and $60,000 per accident as of January 1, 2025 under SB 1107. If the other driver is uninsured or underinsured and you carry UM/UIM coverage, your own insurer pays the shortfall, again reduced by fifty percent. Many Norwalk drivers decline UM coverage, leaving them with no recourse if the at-fault party lacks assets.
Property damage follows a separate three-year deadline under CCP §338, but comparative fault still applies. If your vehicle sustained $10,000 in repairs and you are 50 percent liable, you recover $5,000 from the other party. The insurer may argue you failed to mitigate damages by not reporting the collision via SR-1 form to the DMV within ten days under Vehicle Code §16000, though that filing duty does not itself alter fault percentages.
Local details
Any lawsuit challenging a 50/50 fault determination in Norwalk proceeds at the Norwalk Courthouse, located at 12720 Norwalk Boulevard, Norwalk, CA 90650, which serves the Southeast District of Los Angeles County Superior Court. Personal injury complaints must be filed within two years of the collision under CCP §335.1; if a Caltrans vehicle, a city-owned truck, or a Los Angeles County bus is involved, you must submit a government tort claim within six months under Gov. Code §911.2 or forfeit your right to sue.
Collisions on Interstate 5 (Santa Ana Freeway), Interstate 605 (San Gabriel River Freeway), and State Route 91 (Artesia Freeway) generate high-speed disputes where fault is rarely clear-cut. Crashes on surface corridors—Firestone Boulevard, Rosecrans Avenue, and Pioneer Boulevard—often involve left-turn conflicts, pedestrian crossings, and stop-sign violations. Emergency responders transport serious injuries to St. Francis Medical Center, a Level II trauma center at 3630 East Imperial Highway in Lynwood; medical records from St. Francis often provide the clearest timeline of impact forces and injuries, which help reconstruct who caused the crash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I still sue if the insurance company says we are equally at fault?
Yes. The insurer's 50/50 determination is an initial settlement position, not a legal finding. You may file suit at Norwalk Courthouse within the two-year CCP §335.1 deadline and present evidence to a jury, which assigns fault percentages independently. Many cases settle after discovery reveals facts the adjuster overlooked, shifting liability in your favor.
Does 50/50 fault affect my ability to recover medical expenses?
You recover half your medical bills from the other driver's policy, and your health insurer or MediCal may assert a lien for amounts already paid. If the at-fault party carried only minimum $30,000 limits and your treatment at St. Francis Medical Center exceeded $60,000, a 50/50 reduction leaves a significant gap unless you carry UM/UIM coverage.
What if the other driver had no insurance and I am found 50 percent at fault?
Your uninsured-motorist coverage, if you purchased it, pays your damages minus your fifty-percent share. If you declined UM coverage, you must pursue the uninsured driver personally, which is often impractical. Vehicle Code §16056 requires financial responsibility, but enforcement does not guarantee collection. This scenario underscores the value of UM/UIM endorsements in Los Angeles County.
How long do I have to dispute a 50/50 fault allocation?
CCP §335.1 gives you two years from the collision date to file a personal injury lawsuit; Gov. Code §911.2 requires a government claim within six months if a public entity is liable. Once those deadlines expire, the insurer's allocation becomes final by default because you lose the right to challenge it in court, regardless of new evidence.
Related reading
- Car Accident Practice Area
- Norwalk Car Accident Overview
- What Should I Do Immediately After a Car Accident in La Mirada, CA? | Legal Guide
- What Should I Do Immediately After a Car Accident in Pasadena, CA?
Sources
Talk to a Norwalk car accident attorney
Our California personal injury attorneys offer a free, confidential case review. Call (800) 800-8910 any time, day or night, or request a free case review.
Attorney advertising. This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.